Questions

From the testimony of former hostages interviewed by the Russian media, it seems virtually certain that the terrorists did have ample time to destroy many of the hostages before they themselves had been overcome by the gas or shot by the attacking special forces. Why did they not do so? As we have seen, most of the explosives in the building were „fakes“ or very weak bombs presenting a danger principally to the women terrorists wearing them. Even without detonating the bombs, however, the terrorists carried real automatic weapons and could easily have raked the hostages With automatic-weapon fire. They clearly chose, however, to let the hostages live. Even an Interior Ministry general who had been identified by the terrorists and had been separated from the other hostages was not killed (though his daughter died from the effects of the gas). Theater producer Vasilev has recalled: „When the shooting began, they [the terrorists] told us to lean forward in the theater seats and cover our heads behind the seats.“

—John B. Dunlop, The 2002 Dubrovka and 2004 Beslan Hostage Crises, (Stuttgart: ibidem, 2006), 148.

Schreib einen Kommentar

Yeltsin disbands the legislature, sends tanks to shell parliament, kills demonstrators in order to oppose those who openly advocate an authoritarian model of government

Yeltsin’s main dilemma throughout his entire administration was just how far he was willing to violate democracy in order to save it. In fall 1993, the Supreme Soviet—the parliament, which was still full of ex-Soviet apparatchiks—had blocked his reforms and called on federal regions to rebel. Yeltsin disbanded the legislature and sent tanks to smoke out the deputies who barricaded themselves inside; 140 died in the melee. It was a tough choice, but the alternative had seemed worse: total economic collapse and political implosion.

The Communists did not quit. As Yeltsin’s presidential term continued, he was opposed once again by a newly elected hostile parliament, the Duma, where the tone was set by Communists as well as the neo-fascist party of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who openly advocated an authoritarian model of government.

—Alexander Goldfarb, Death of a Dissident, (New York: Free Press, 2007), 33.

Schreib einen Kommentar

Biden at G7

Schreib einen Kommentar

09.06.1954


Schreib einen Kommentar

Gabor Maté on children in Gaza and his own experience as a Jewish child in 1940s Hungary

Schreib einen Kommentar

Fabio De Masi (BSW) on the war in Ukraine

Schreib einen Kommentar

Sahra Wagenknecht at Alexanderplatz


Schreib einen Kommentar

US State Department official Stacy Gilbert explains why she resigned over U.S. policy in Gaza

„The subject matter experts are absolutely in agreement that Israel is blocking humanitarian assistance. There is no doubt about that.“

Schreib einen Kommentar

02.06.1967

Soweit in der Bundesrepublik der Revolte der Studenten historische Bedeutung zuerkannt wird, gilt das Todesdatum von Benno Ohnesorg als ihr eigentlicher Beginn.

—Ulrich Chaussy, »Rudi Dutschke«, (München: Droemer, 2018), 226.

Friederike Hausmann (damals Dollinger) kümmert sich im Hof des Hauses Krumme Straße 66/67 um den schwer verletzten Ohnesorg. Unter dem Kopf Ohnesorgs sein Transparent mit der Aufschrift: „Autonomie für die Teheraner Universität“.

Schreib einen Kommentar

Schreib einen Kommentar

BUNDESTAGSWAHL | Sonntagsfrage INSA/BILD am Sonntag

Union: 31% (+1)
SPD: 16% (+1)
AfD: 16% (-1)
GRÜNE: 12% (-1)
BSW: 7%
FDP: 5%
LINKE: 3%
FW: 3%
Sonstige: 7%

Änderungen zur letzten Umfrage vom 25. Mai 2024

Kommentare deaktiviert für

Fabio De Masi (BSW) on the war in Ukraine

Kommentare deaktiviert für Fabio De Masi (BSW) on the war in Ukraine